California Supreme Court rules AI vendors can be held liable for discrimination in employment-related tasks, affecting AI vendors, recruiters and screeners. The ruling is expected to lead to more litigation.

What can Napster tell us about the future?

AI Litigation Database This database presents information about ongoing and completed litigation involving artificial intelligence, including machine learning. It covers cases from complaint forward – as soon as we learn of them – whether or not they generate published decisions. It is intended to be broad in scope, covering everything from algorithms used in hiring … Continue reading "AI Litigation Database"

The proliferation of AI-related litigation has shocked dockets across the country, and the rise of AI class actions is inevitable as consumers and companies alike look to the courts for redress from the potentially unlawful use of their protected data in training generative AI models.

Barry Diller fired publishers’ opening shot at artificial intelligence platforms in a Semafor interview this April, suggesting they sue the companies that have trained models on their data.

While evolving AI models are likely to bring their own set of changes to the insurance industry, such as the creation of new, AI-bespoke policies, until then, companies will have to rely on a portfolio of insurance products for coverage.

Google is facing a class action lawsuit alleging that its AI training practices violated privacy, data ownership, and intellectual property rights. The lawsuit claims that Google has built its AI models by stealing publicly available information from the internet. Google denies the accusations and argues that using publicly available information is not stealing or an invasion of privacy. The lawsuit represents a battle over who owns the internet and the data found on it, and the outcome could have implications for the field of generative AI.

The New York Times may sue OpenAI over copyright violations due to content use in ChatGPT. Lawsuit could harm OpenAI, entail fines, data loss, and redefine content rights. NYT fears AI competition. Legal battle could affect AI copyright landscape.

Attorneys general from all 50 US states urge Congress to address AI-generated child sexual abuse material (CSAM) by forming an expert commission and expanding laws. They emphasize the urgency of protecting children as AI-generated CSAM and deepfake tech pose growing threats.

Generative AI is inviting suits aplenty for perceived copyright violations.